Cyclodextrins or liposomes?
When thinking about advanced drug delivery systems, two names always come up: cyclodextrins (CDs) and liposomes.
Both are powerful tools – but the right choice depends on asking the right questions.
Here are the top 5 considerations:
1️⃣ Solubility & Stability – Does the API suffer from poor aqueous solubility or chemical instability?
→ CDs excel in solubilizing small molecules; liposomes offer protection and controlled release.
2️⃣ Cargo Type – Are we delivering a small, lipophilic drug or a larger biomolecule (RNA, peptide, protein)?
→ CDs are ideal for small hydrophobic compounds; liposomes handle complex biologics.
3️⃣ Release Profile – Do we need immediate solubilization or sustained/targeted release?
→ CDs act fast; liposomes can be tuned for controlled or site-specific delivery.
4️⃣ Biocompatibility & Safety – Which system aligns better with the intended route of administration (oral, IV, topical)?
→ Both are biocompatible, but formulation history, excipient acceptance, and dose levels matter.
5️⃣ Scalability & Cost – Can the system be manufactured reliably and at scale?
→ CDs often offer simpler, cost-effective formulations; liposomes require more complex processes but enable versatile applications.
The truth is: it’s not about which is “better”—it’s about matching the delivery system to the therapeutic challenge.
At CarboHyde, we’re passionate about cyclodextrins, but we also recognize where liposomes shine. That is why Tamas Kiss, created this great comparison.
The future of drug delivery will likely see hybrid solutions, combining the strengths of both worlds.




